Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(68 KB bytes)

Title: GPP in Loblolly Pine: A Monthly Comparison of Empirical and Process Models

Author: Gough, Christopher; Seiler, John; Johnsen, Kurt; Sampson, David Arthur

Date: 2002

Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 66-71

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

   Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

Description: Monthly and yearly gross primary productivity (GPP) estimates derived from an empirical and two process based models (3PG and BIOMASS) were compared. Spatial and temporal variation in foliar gas photosynthesis was examined and used to develop GPP prediction models for fertilized nine-year-old loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) stands located in the North Carolina Sandhills. Foliar gas exchange in both the upper and lower thirds of crowns was monitored monthly for a year. Based on these data, empirical models were developed for the growing and non-growing seasons and upper and lower crown levels. Common empirical models include the variables photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), Ln(PAR), and VPD. Statistical differences in model estimates for crown positions and for both the growing and non-growing seasons indicated that the use of separate empirical models was appropriate for GPP estimations, yet simulated light-response curves yield similar rates. Monthly GPP estimates derived from empirical models were compared with process model predictions. Average monthly environmental data were applied to models to estimate GPP. Both process models predicted a greater relative GPP during the growing season (80 percent) compared with the empirical model (65 percent), while the opposite trend was apparent for the non-growing season. Monthly GPP variability was greater in the 3PG and BIOMASS predictions, appearing to reflect monthly temperatures and stand growth, while the empirical analysis predicted a relatively high contribution to yearly GPP during the non-growing season. Predicted GPPs for the entire year were 192.8, 142.8, and 192.4 mol C/m2 for the empirical, BIOMASS, and 3PG models, respectively.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Gough, Christopher; Seiler, John; Johnsen, Kurt; Sampson, David Arthur 2002. GPP in Loblolly Pine: A Monthly Comparison of Empirical and Process Models. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS–48. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 66-71

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.