Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(123 KB)

Title: Accuracy and equivalence testing of crown ratio models and assessment of their impact on diameter growth and basal area increment predictions of two variants of the Forest Vegetation Simulator

Author: Leites, Laura P.; Robinson, Andrew P.; Crookston, Nicholas L.

Date: 2009

Source: Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 39: 655-665.

Publication Series: Journal/Magazine Article (JRNL)

Description: Diameter growth (DG) equations in many existing forest growth and yield models use tree crown ratio (CR) as a predictor variable. Where CR is not measured, it is estimated from other measured variables. We evaluated CR estimation accuracy for the models in two Forest Vegetation Simulator variants: the exponential and the logistic CR models used in the North Idaho (NI) variant, and the Weibull model used in the South Central Oregon and Northeast California (SO) variant. We also assessed the effects of using measured (CRm) versus predicted (CRp) crown ratio for predicting 10 year DG and 30 year basal area increment (BAI). Evaluation criteria included equivalence tests, bias, root mean square error, and Spearman's coefficient of rank correlation. Inventory data from the Winema and the Colville National Forests were used. Results showed that the NI variant models overpredicted CR when CRm was below 40% and underpredicted CR when it was above 60%, whereas the SO variant model overpredicted CR when CRm was smaller than 60%. Differences between CRm and CRp were positively correlated with differences in DG predictions. Using CRm versus CRp resulted in 30 year BAI absolute percent differences of 10% or less for more than 50% of the plots.

Keywords: diameter growth (DG), tree crown ratio (CR), models, Forest Vegetation Simulator

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Leites, Laura P.; Robinson, Andrew P.; Crookston, Nicholas L. 2009. Accuracy and equivalence testing of crown ratio models and assessment of their impact on diameter growth and basal area increment predictions of two variants of the Forest Vegetation Simulator. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 39: 655-665.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.