Title: Analysing designed experiments in distance sampling
Author: Buckland, Stephen T.; Russell, Robin E.; Dickson, Brett G.; Saab, Victoria A.; Gorman, Donal N.; Block, William M.
Date: 2009
Source: Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 14: 432-442.
Description: Distance sampling is a survey technique for estimating the abundance or density of wild animal populations. Detection probabilities of animals inherently differ by species, age class, habitats, or sex. By incorporating the change in an observer's ability to detect a particular class of animals as a function of distance, distance sampling leads to density estimates that are comparable across different species, ages, habitats, sexes, etc. Increasing interest in evaluating the effects of management practices on animal populations in an experimental context has led to a need for suitable methods of analysis of distance sampling data. We outline a two-stage approach for analysing distance sampling data from designed experiments, in which a two-step bootstrap is used to quantify precision and identify treatment effects. The approach is illustrated using data from a before-after control-impact experiment designed to assess the effects of large-scale prescribed fire treatments on bird densities in ponderosa pine forests of the southwestern United States.
Keywords: BACI design, bootstrap, distance sampling, point transect sampling
View and Print this Publication (148.04 KB)
Publication Notes:
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility
Citation
Buckland, Stephen T.; Russell, Robin E.; Dickson, Brett G.; Saab, Victoria A.; Gorman, Donal N.; Block, William M. 2009. Analysing designed experiments in distance sampling. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics. 14: 432-442..