Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(2.0 MB)

Title: Biased estimation of forest log characteristics using intersect diameters

Author: Bate, Lisa J.; Torgersen, Torolf R.; Wisdom, Michael J.; Garton, Edward O.

Date: 2009

Source: Forest Ecology and Management doi: 10.1 016/j.foreco.2009.04.042

Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)

Description: Logs are an important structural feature of forest ecosystems, and their abundance affects many resources and forest processes, including fire regimes, soil productivity, silviculture, carbon cycling, and wildlife habitat. Consequently, logs are often sampled to estimate their frequency, percent cover, volume, and weight. The line-intersect method (LIM) is one of the most widely used methods to obtain these estimates and has been shown to produce unbiased estimates of log characteristics. With the traditional LIM the diameters of each log at the point of its intersection with the sampling transect are used to estimate log characteristics. Based on a simulation study and a large set of empirical data, we found that use of intersect log diameters to define size classes provided biased estimates of log characteristics. The bias varied by diameter class. Results from the simulation study showed that log frequency and volume were overestimated in small-diameter log classes and underestimated in large diameter classes. Similarly, results from our empirical analysis showed a 40% overestimate of log volume in the smallest diameter class (15-25 cm), and a 31% underestimate of volume in the largest diameter class (>50 cm). Just as size classes of snags and trees are best defined by their diameter-at breast height (DBH), size classes of logs should be defined by their large-end diameters (LEOs). When large-end diameters of logs were used instead of diameters measured at the point of transect intersection, bias was substantially reduced or eliminated. These results indicate that line-intersect sampling could be substantially improved by including measurements of LEOs to estimate log characteristics. Our results have far-reaching implications for estimates of log characteristics, such as estimates of fuel loading and subsequent wildfire risk, carbon source and sink dynamics, silviculture, nutrient cycling, and habitat for wildlife. Without our suggested correction to line-intersect sampling, many forest resources associated with log characteristics will not be estimated accurately, affecting a plethora of log-based management and research programs.

Keywords: coarse woody debris, down woody material, fuel management, logs, intersect diameter, line-intersect sampling, silviculture, wildlife

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Bate, Lisa J.; Torgersen, Torolf R.; Wisdom, Michael J.; Garton, Edward O. 2009. Biased estimation of forest log characteristics using intersect diameters. Forest Ecology and Management. 258: 635-640.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.