Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(209 KB)

Title: A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's bald eagle biosentinel program

Author: Leith, Katherine F.; Bowerman, William W.; Wierda, Michael R.; Best, Dave A.; Grubb, Teryl G.; Sikarske, James G.

Date: 2010

Source: Chemosphere. 80: 7-12.

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Monitoring of contaminants in the environment is an important part of understanding the fate of ecosystems after a chemical insult. Frequently, such monitoring efforts result in datasets with observations below the detection limit (DL) that are reported as 'non-detect' or '< DL' and no value is provided. This study explored the effects of non-detect data and their treatment on summary statistics. The data analyzed in this paper are real-world data. They consist of both large (N = 234) and moderate (n = 12-64) sample sizes with both good and marginal fit to an assumed distribution with a log-transformation. Summary statistics were calculated using (1) the '0.0001' near-zero method of substitution, (2) substitution with '1/2 DL', (3) multiple imputation, and (4) KaplanĀ­Meier estimation. Median was used for comparison. Several analytical options for datasets with non-detect observations are available. The general consensus is that substitution methods ((1) and (2)) can produce biased summary statistics, especially as levels of substitution increase. Substitution methods continue to be used in research, likely because they are easy to implement. The objectives were to (1) assess the fit of lognormal distribution to the data, (2) compare and contrast the performance of four analytical treatments of left-censored data in terms of estimated geometric mean and standard error, and (3) make recommendations based on those results.

Keywords: Kaplan-Meier, substitution, outliers, multiple imputation, non-detect

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Leith, Katherine F.; Bowerman, William W.; Wierda, Michael R.; Best, Dave A.; Grubb, Teryl G.; Sikarske, James G. 2010. A comparison of techniques for assessing central tendency in left-censored data using PCB and p,p'DDE contaminant concentrations from Michigan's bald eagle biosentinel program. Chemosphere. 80: 7-12.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.