Title: Red flags: correlates of impaired species recovery
Author: Hutchings, Jeffrey A.; Butchart, Stuart H. M.; Collen, Ben; Schwartz, Michael K.; Waples, Robin S.
Source: Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 27(10): 542-546.
Description: Conservation biology research exhibits a striking but unhelpful dichotomy. Analyses of species decline, extinction risk, and threat mitigation typically encompass broad taxonomic and spatial scales. By contrast, most studies of recovery lack generality, pertaining to specific species, populations, or locales. Narrowly focused analyses offer a weak empirical basis for identifying generic recovery correlates across species, particularly in cases where recovery is not effected by an abatement of threats. We present a research framework for multi-species metaanalyses to identify early-warning signals - 'red flags' - of impaired recovery that can be used as predictors of recovery potential before recovery efforts are initiated. An empirically comprehensive understanding of the demographic, ecological, evolutionary, and threat-related factors affecting the rate and trajectory of species recovery will strengthen conservation efforts to set recovery priorities, targets, and timelines.
Keywords: conservation biology research, recovery
View or Print this Publication (215 KB)
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
Hutchings, Jeffrey A.; Butchart, Stuart H. M.; Collen, Ben; Schwartz, Michael K.; Waples, Robin S. 2012. Red flags: correlates of impaired species recovery. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 27(10): 542-546.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility