Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(2.0 MB)

Title: Response of transplanted aspen to irrigation and weeding on a Colorado reclaimed surface coal mine

Author: Musselman, Robert C.; Shepperd, Wayne D.; Smith, Frederick W.; Asherin, Lance A.; Gee, Brian W.

Date: 2012

Source: Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-101. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 20 p.

Publication Series: Research Paper (RP)

Description: Successful re-establishment of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) on surface-mined lands in the western United States is problematic because the species generally regenerates vegetatively by sprouting from parent roots in the soil; however, topsoil is removed in the mining process. Previous attempts to plant aspen on reclaimed mine sites have failed because transplanted root sprouts or seedlings do not have an extensive root system to access water and nutrients. This study identified factors that limit the survival and growth of aspen on reclaimed surface-mined lands by examining planted aspen saplings with supplemental irrigation and removal of competing vegetation in a fenced plot. The aspen saplings were grown on reclaimed roto-tilled, fresh-hauled soil or on dozer-cleared stored soils. Separate observations were made on survival and growth of nearby plots of natural aspen sprouts (fenced or unfenced) and on potted aspen seedlings. The best combination of conditions for aspen survival used transplanted saplings from local sources on fresh-hauled soil directly removed and placed from local aspen stands. Growth was better when competing vegetation was controlled by hand-hoeing around individual trees. The plants responded less to irrigation, but irrigation with non-saline water may enhance survival and growth in years with drought conditions. Aspen trees in an unfenced plot were heavily damaged by browsing ungulates.

Keywords: Populus tremuloides, aspen, reforestation, irrigation, mine reclamation, fencing, weeding

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Musselman, Robert C.; Shepperd, Wayne D.; Smith, Frederick W.; Asherin, Lance A.; Gee, Brian W. 2012. Response of transplanted aspen to irrigation and weeding on a Colorado reclaimed surface coal mine. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-101. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 20 p.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.