Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(963 KB)

Title: Long term consequences of a controlled slash burn and slash mastication to soil moisture and CO2 at a southern Colorado site

Author: Massman, W. J.; Frank, J. M.; Jimenez Esquilin, A. E.; Stromberger, M. E.; Shepperd, W. D.

Date: 2006

Source: In: 27th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Paper 2.2. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. Online: https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/111082.pdf

Publication Series: Paper (invited, offered, keynote)

Description: Thinning of forest stands is frequently used to reduce the risk of catastrophic fire. But thinning requires that the refuse (or slash) be removed from the site, which can be done either by burning it or by mastication and dispersal. Either method has long term consequences to the soil and to soil moisture and soil CO2 levels. For example, after the initial drying of the soil by a fire, soil moisture in burned areas tends to exceed that of unburned areas because the loss of vegetation reduces or eliminates transpiration (Neary and Ffolliott, 2005). This situation may persist until the vegetation is reestablished. In general, burning also tends to reduce soil respiration (Amiro et al., 2003) and, therefore, soil CO2 amounts and fluxes. Nevertheless, some environmental conditions will allow the soil respiration of a burned area to exceed that of an unburned area (Andersson et al., 2004). In fact, exposing soil to a severe fire may actually increase heterotrophic respiration (Bisset and Parkinson, 1980; Richter et al., 2000). In this situation the consequences to soil CO2 and soil fluxes is less clear because nearby unburned areas may still support autotrophic respiration. This increase in heterotrophic respiration in the burned area is thought to result from the stimulation of the soil microbiota by increased soil temperatures (Bisset and Parkinson, 1980; Richter et al., 2000) and/or elevated levels of bioavailable nutrients (Fyles et al., 2001; Choromanska and DeLuca, 2002; Certini, 2005).

Keywords: fire, thinning, slash burn, slash mastication, soil moisture, CO2

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to rschneider@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Massman, W. J.; Frank, J. M.; Jimenez Esquilin, A. E.; Stromberger, M. E.; Shepperd, W. D. 2006. Long term consequences of a controlled slash burn and slash mastication to soil moisture and CO2 at a southern Colorado site. In: 27th Conference on Agricultural and Forest Meteorology. Paper 2.2. Boston, MA: American Meteorological Society. Online: https://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/111082.pdf

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.