Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

GeoTreesearch


Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

(785 KB)

Title: In-Place Preservative Treatments for Covered Bridges

Author: Lebow, Stan; Morrell, Jeff

Date: 2014

Source: Guide for In-Place Preservative Treatment of Covered Bridges. Proceedings, Second National Covered Bridge Conference. June 5 – 8., 2013. Dayton, OH. 2014; 32 p.

Publication Series: Full Proceedings

Description: Covered bridges can be vulnerable to damage from fungal decay and insect attack. This paper describes procedures for selecting and applying in-place treatments to prevent or arrest biodegradation, and summarizes recent research evaluating some of these treatments. Wood moisture is the key to decay and termite attack, and the first line of defense against biodeterioration is to minimize moisture intrusion through prompt maintenance and repair. Biodeterioration will tend to be more prevalent wherever members contact abutments, are near the ends of bridges subject to wetting from splashing, or are below windows or other openings that allow entry of wind-blown precipitation. In-place preservative applications can help limit deterioration when moisture cannot be eliminated. The goal of in-place treatment is to distribute preservative into areas of a structure that are vulnerable to moisture accumulation. In-place treatments include surface coatings, pastes, rods, gels and fumigants. Some preservative treatments may cause a color change in the treated wood and/or present safety and handling concerns. One limitation of all these treatments is that they cannot be forced deeply into the wood as is done in pressure-treatment processes. However, some can be applied into the center of large members via treatment holes and can move through the wood by vaporization or diffusion. Laboratory research compared the movement of 7 water diffusible treatments and 3 fumigant treatments as a function of moisture content, wood species and dosage. Field research evaluated the mobility of two water diffusible treatments and two fumigants placed into timbers in 5 covered bridges. The wood in many covered bridge timbers was too dry to promote diffusion. Water diffusible treatments must be applied in locations where moisture accumulation is suspected. Fumigants have greater potential for movement in dry bridge timbers and refractory wood species.

Keywords: covered bridges, decay, termites, wood preservatives, in-place treatments

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Lebow, Stan; Morrell, Jeff 2014. In-Place Preservative Treatments for Covered Bridges. Guide for In-Place Preservative Treatment of Covered Bridges. Proceedings, Second National Covered Bridge Conference. June 5 – 8., 2013. Dayton, OH. 2014; 32 p.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.