You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Comparing Basal Area Growth Rates in Repeated Inventories: Simpson's Paradox in Forestry
Author: Thomas, Charles E.; Parresol, Bernard R.;
Source: Forest Science, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.1029-1039.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Recent analyses of radial growth rates in southern commercial forests have shown that current rates are lower than past rates when compared diameter class by diameter class. These results have been interpreted as an indication that the growth rate of the forest is declining. In this paper, growth rates of forest populations in Alabama are studied. Basal area growth (a function of both radius and radial growth squared) by diameter classes is examined for plantation and natural stands. Basal area growth and population distribution for the 1962-1972 and 1972-1982 measurement periods are pre-sented. Also, significance of Simpson’s paradox in these analyses is discussed. Basal area growth proves to be consistent with changes that have occurred in tree frequency in diameter classes, i.e., stand structure. In Alabama’s natural stands, basal area growth is shown to be relatively constant over the most recent inventories, while it has increased in plantations. Simple comparison of radial growth would be misleading.
Keywords: Contingency table, diameter distribution, radial growth, un-equal probability sampling, sample stratification
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Thomas, Charles E.; Parresol, Bernard R. 1989. Comparing Basal Area Growth Rates in Repeated Inventories: Simpson''s Paradox in Forestry. Forest Science, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp.1029-1039.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility