Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (1.5 MB)

Title: Use of plastic films for weed control during field establishment of micropropagated hardwoods

Author: Van Sambeek, J. W.; Preece, John E.; Huetteman, Carl A.; Roth, Paul L.;

Date: 1995

Source: In: Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Fosbroke, Sandra L. C., ed. Proceedings, 10th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 1995 March 5-8; Morgantown, WV.: Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-197. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 496-506

Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)

   Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

Description: This study compares the use of plastic films to conventional methods for establishing hardwoods on a recently cultivated old field site using 1-year-old micropropagated plantlets of white ash (Fraxinus americana L.) and silver maple (Acer saccharinum L.). After one growing season in the field, height of plantlets with all weed control treatments exceeded the height of the plantlets in the non-weeded control. After two growing seasons, plantlets of both species established with plastic films were taller than plantlets with conventional methods of weed control or in the non-weeded plots. No differences were found in plantlet height growth when established with opaque white film, solid black plastic, or porous black plastic. Silver maple plantlets were taller than the white ash plantlets after the first (47 vs 35 cm), second year (114 vs 72 cm), and third years (179 vs 101 cm). Soils under the plastic films had more available moisture in the spring and less available moisture during the summer than the other treatments. During the late fall, soil moisture was again near field capacity in all treatments. After three growing seasons, the solid plastic films had begun to disintegrate. Our results suggest that plastic films can be an effective alternative to chemical or mechanical weed control when establishing hardwoods.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • This publication may be available in hard copy. Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
  • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Van Sambeek, J. W.; Preece, John E.; Huetteman, Carl A.; Roth, Paul L. 1995. Use of plastic films for weed control during field establishment of micropropagated hardwoods. In: Gottschalk, Kurt W.; Fosbroke, Sandra L. C., ed. Proceedings, 10th Central Hardwood Forest Conference; 1995 March 5-8; Morgantown, WV.: Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-197. Radnor, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 496-506

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.