Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (967 KB)

Title: A comparison of point-count and mist-net detections of songbirds by habitat and time-of-season

Author: Pagen, Rich W.; Thompson, Frank R., III III; Burhans, Dirk E.;

Date: 2002

Source: Journal of Field Ornithology 73(1):53-59

Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)

Description: We compared the results of point-count and mist-net surveys during the breeding and post-breeding seasons in four Missouri Ozark habitats: mature upland forest, mature riparian forest, 9- to 10-yr-old upland forest and 3- to 4-yr-old upland forest created by clearcutting. We determined whether differences in abundance estimates among habitats or between breeding and post-breeding seasons varied with survey method (i.e., habitat x method, season x method, or habitat x season x method interaction effects), The habitat x method interaction was significant for 13 of 16 species. The general pattern was for canopy or sub-canopy species to be detected by point counts more often in the mature-forest habitats, and to be detected by mist nets more often in the young-forest habitats. The season x method interaction was significant for 6 species largely because there was a greater decrease from breeding to post breeding season in mist-net captures than point-count detections. Two species had a significant habitat x season x method interaction. Differences in the patterns in abundance among habitats and between seasons, by survey method, are indicative of bias in the survey methods. Individuals planning bird surveys should recognize these biases and select the method that best samples the segment of the community they are surveying and that is least likely to confound treatment effects. Often this may require the use of multiple survey methods.

Keywords: forest habitat, habitat effects, Missouri, seasonal effects, survey methods

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • This publication may be available in hard copy. Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
  • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Pagen, Rich W.; Thompson, Frank R., III; Burhans, Dirk E. 2002. A comparison of point-count and mist-net detections of songbirds by habitat and time-of-season. Journal of Field Ornithology 73(1):53-59

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.