Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (432 KB)

Title: Overview of hemlock health

Author: Souto, Dennis R.; Shields, Kathleen S.;

Date: 2000

Source: In: McManus, Katherine A.; Shields, Kathleen S.; Souto, Dennis R., eds. Proceedings: Symposium on sustainable management of hemlock ecosystems in eastern North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-267. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 76-80.

Publication Series: General Technical Report (GTR)

   Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

Description: Although many insects and diseases are associated with hemlock, we will, ironically, draw our first conclusion, that hemlocks are very sensitive to the stress of insect defoliation, from a tale of gypsy moth defoliation. The unprecedented gypsy moth (Lymantria dispar L.) outbreak of 1981, when nearly 13 million acres were defoliated in the Northeast (Fig. 1), resulted in hemlock snags throughout the hardwood forest at West Point, New York (and many other locations), in 1986. There were so many larvae in May 1981 that all the preferred hardwood leaves were eaten and the caterpillars still needed more foliage. They turned their hungry attention to the white pine (Pinus strobus L.) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis (L.) Carriere) trees that grew in association with the hardwoods and, in many cases, defoliated these conifers completely. Hemlock and white pine responded to this defoliation in very different ways (Stephens 1984). Hemlock trees died within 1 year and most of these were dominant or codominant trees. In contrast, many fewer white pine trees died and the trees that did die succumbed slowly-within 5 years. In addition, these white pine were mostly intermediate or suppressed trees. Stephens (1984) hypothesized that the species impacts were caused by differential bud development patterns and by how much bud (1982 growth) damage each species sustained.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • This publication may be available in hard copy. Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
  • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Souto, Dennis R.; Shields, Kathleen S. 2000. Overview of hemlock health. In: McManus, Katherine A.; Shields, Kathleen S.; Souto, Dennis R., eds. Proceedings: Symposium on sustainable management of hemlock ecosystems in eastern North America. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-267. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 76-80.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.