You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Which nature? A case study of Whitetop Mountain
Author: Robertson, David P.; Hull, R. Bruce;
Source: Landscape Journal 20(2):176-185
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Description: Nature is socially constructed and many different environmental conditions can be considered natural. These assertions have profound implications for landscape design, planning, and management. In our case study of Whitetop Mountain, we found four discrete but closely related natures - ecotourism, romanticism, pastoralism, and ecologism - each of which provides a unique way of understanding and valuing the landscape.These discourses of nature describe a variety of different environmental conditions that are both possible and acceptable at Whitetop Mountain. Each discourse suggests a different definition of environmental quality and a different vision of the mountain's future. In conclusion, we discuss implications of these differing discourses of nature for the design, planning, and management of natural landscapes and propose a fifth discourse - bioculturalism.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- This publication may be available in hard copy. Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
- Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact Sharon Hobrla, firstname.lastname@example.org if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.
XML: View XML
Robertson, David P.; Hull, R. Bruce 2000. Which nature? A case study of Whitetop Mountain. Landscape Journal 20(2):176-185
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility