Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (340 KB bytes)

Title: Spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) response to traps baited with selected semiochemicals in Utah.

Author: Ross, Darrell W.; Daterman, Gary E.; Munson, A. Steven.;

Date: 2005

Source: Western North American Naturalist. 65(1): 123-126

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Spruce beetle, Dendroctonus rufipennis (Kirby), populations periodically reach outbreak densities throughout the range of spruce, Picea spp., in western North America. During outbreaks it may kill thousands to millions of trees over vast areas, dramatically altering forest structure, composition, and ecological processes, thus impacting a variety of resource values (Schmid and Frye 1977, Veblen et al. 1991, Holsten et al. 1995, 1999, Ross et al. 2001). Current options for reducing negative impacts on resource values caused by the spruce beetle include harvesting high-risk trees, sanitation/salvage logging, insecticide applications to high-value trees, felling and removal of trap trees, lethal trap trees, burying infested material, and burning or removing bark of infested trees (Holsten et al. 1999). Resource managers have used mass trapping with semiochemical-baited traps to some extent, but further research is needed to make this treatment more effective. An attempt to mass trap spruce beetle in Alaska reduced the number of subsequent beetle-attacked trees compared with untreated control plots, but beetle catches were considered low relative to beetle populations in the area (Werner and Holsten 1995). In Utah semiochemical-baited traps were used in conjunction with felling and burning of infested trees and trap trees to effectively suppress an isolated spruce beetle population (Bentz and Munson 2000).

Keywords: Dendroctonus rufipennis, spruce beetle, pheromones, trapping, frontalin, seudenol, MCOL, ethanol, α, -pinene, Scolytidae

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pnw_pnwpubs@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Ross, Darrell W.; Daterman, Gary E.; Munson, A. Steven. 2005. Spruce beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) response to traps baited with selected semiochemicals in Utah. Western North American Naturalist. 65(1): 123-126

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.