You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Legal distinction between employee and independent contractor as applied to collective bargaining activities in timber harvesting
Author: Granskog, James E.; Siegal, William C.;
Source: Forest Products Journal Vol. 28(9): 16-20
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Collective bargaining attempts by timber harvesting labor groups is often complicated by lack of a clear legal distinction between "employees" and "independent contractors." the primary criterion to make the distinction - the "right-to-control" test of common law - has now been amplified by a number of secondary tests, including: 1) the right to discharge; 2) the degree of skill required by the worker; 3) permanency or length of service; 4) ownership or extent of personal investment in equipment and facilities; 5) opportunities for profit or loss; and 6) method of payment (by time or by job). Several other guidlines also exist, including the question of ownership of stumpage, a factor peculiar to timber harvesting cases.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Granskog, James E.; Siegal, William C. 1977. Legal distinction between employee and independent contractor as applied to collective bargaining activities in timber harvesting. Forest Products Journal Vol. 28(9): 16-20
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility