Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (679 KB bytes)

Title: Recommendations for treated-area choice assays with termites (Isoptera)

Author: Peterson, Chris J.; Gerard, Patrick D.; Ems-Wilson, Janice;

Date: 2005

Source: Sociobiology Vol. 44, No. 1, 2004

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: The repellency of catnip (Nepeta cataria) essential oil was evaluated in a treated-area choice assay with subterranean termites (Reticulitermes spp.). It appeared that fewer R. virginicus were found on the treated portion of a petri dish within a period of about 7d; R. flavipes was not affected by the presence of the oil. The data collected from the control dishes, however, showed an unacceptably high Type I error rate (rejection of H0:nt=nu, when Ho is true, where nt is the expected number of termites on the treated side and nu is the expected number of insects on the untreated side). The tendency of termites to cluster was the probably reason for this, and calls into question the data obtained from the tests. Computer simulations, using a range of cluster factors, replications and numbers of termites per replication, were conducted, and the Type I error rate was calculated when a cluster center (a point corresponding to a random angle O and radius p value withing a circle) and random "termite" positions about the cluster center were plotted. Type I error rates were consistently inflated for all analyses that were based on individual animal behavior, and could not be corrected by increasing replications. We recommend an analysis where the number of insects on the treated or untreated side is recorded, then the dish is designated as "repelled" or "not repelled," and the number of repelled dishes is analyzed. This method effectively controls the Type I error rate so that it is no greater than the nominal value. It is recommended to use at least 25 replications to ensure adequate statistical power. Analysis or Boschloo's Exact Unconditional test.

Keywords: Reticulitermes spp., choice-assay, repellent, clustering, analysis

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Peterson, Chris J.; Gerard, Patrick D.; Ems-Wilson, Janice 2005. Recommendations for treated-area choice assays with termites (Isoptera). Sociobiology Vol. 44, No. 1, 2004

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.