Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (503 KB bytes)

Title: The effects of removing condition boundaries on FIA estimates

Author: Gartner, David; Reams, Gregory;

Date: 2002

Source: McRoberts, R.E.; Reams, G.A.; van Deusen, P.C.; [and others] NC-252. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station: 149-153.

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: When Forest Inverltory and Analysis (FIA) changed to the national standards for the inventory system, plots with lnultiplc condition codes were introduced to the Southern Station's FIA unit. FIA maps up to five different conditions on completely or partially forested 1124-acre subplots. This change has madc producing inventory estimates more complex because the data are analyzed by condition classes (partial plot) rather than on a whole plot. Methods for analyzing by condition classes are less intuitively obvious than methods based on a single condition for an entire plot. We compared the current standard of fully rnapped plots to two methods that reduce the number of mapped conditions per plot using the following sets of rules. Rule 1 assigns the predoniinant condition to the entire plot, including plots that are partially forested. Rule 2 maps a single nonforest condition and a single forest condition, with the single forest condition predominant. The effects of these changes were shown by calculating forest area by forest type group and ownership and volume by species and diameter class. The effect of using just one condition per plot (rule 1) increased the estimated total forested area by 0.4 percent. Using rule 1 decreased the calculated total volume for the state by 3.9 percent. Using only one forested condition per plot (rule 2) did not change the total area estimate or the voluine estimates. Both methods decreased the estimated variance for the total volumc by 12 to 16 percent. The percent changes in the estimated values were greatest in the least occurring table entries, e.g., the rarest colnbinations of forest type and ownership group or colnbinations of species and diameter class.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Gartner, David; Reams, Gregory 2002. The effects of removing condition boundaries on FIA estimates. McRoberts, R.E.; Reams, G.A.; van Deusen, P.C.; [and others] NC-252. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Research Station: 149-153.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.