You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species
Author: Reaves, Dixie Watts; Kramer, Randall A.; Holmes, Thomas P.;
Source: Environmental and Resource Economics 14: 365-383, 1999
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: A three-way treatment design is used to compare contingent valuation response formats. Respondents are asked to value an endangered species (the red-cockaded woodpecker) and the restoration of its habitat following a natural disaster. For three question formats (open-ended, payment card, and double-bounded dichotomous choice), differences in survey response rates, item non-response rates, and protest bids are examined. Bootstrap techniques are used to compare means across formats and to explore differences in willingness to pay (WTP) distribution functions. Convergent validity is found in a comparison of mean WTP values, although some differences are apparent in the cumulative distribution functions. Differences across formats are also identified in item non-response rates and proportion of protest bids. Overall, the payment card format exhibits desirable properties relative to the other two formats.
Keywords: contingent valuation, endangered species, question format, red-cockaded woodpecker
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Reaves, Dixie Watts; Kramer, Randall A.; Holmes, Thomas P. 1999. Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered Species. Environmental and Resource Economics 14: 365-383, 1999
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility