Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (166 KB bytes)

Title: Evaluating some proposed matrices for scoring sub-optimal red-cockaded woodpecker foraging habitat in relation to the 2003 recovery plan

Author: Lipscomb, Donald J.; Williams, Thomas M.;

Date: 2006

Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 10-16

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

   Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

Description: We have used RCWFAT (an ARC-INFO program that evaluates RCW habitat) to examine the 2003 Red Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) Recovery Plan, which will influence silvicultural activities on large tracts of southeastern forests. The new plan includes 11 specific characteristics of forest stands that constitute “Good Quality Foraging Habitat” (GQFH) and requires 120 to 200 acres of GQFH for each RCW group. To evaluate the criteria requires a minimum data set that is not met by most product-based forest inventory data. The criteria of GQFH also define ideal RCW habitat. When used as a pass-fail system, the criteria of the Recovery Plan are a poor ecosystem management tool. On the Oakmulgee Ranger District, where the RCW population is declining, only 2 of 189 clusters had sufficient GQFH. On Ft. Bragg, NC, where the RCW population is increasing, only 19 of 496 clusters had sufficient GQFH. Few foraging areas met all of the criteria, and few would meet the criteria after a single silvicultural treatment. An effort has been underway to develop a method to rank less-than-ideal habitat. We examine three alternatives considered in the pursuit of such a method. Scoring of individual stands has proven relatively consistent in all three alternatives. Due to the complexity of interaction among the 11 criteria, efforts to establish scores for entire cluster forage partitions have produced inconsistent results.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Lipscomb, Donald J.; Williams, Thomas M. 2006. Evaluating some proposed matrices for scoring sub-optimal red-cockaded woodpecker foraging habitat in relation to the 2003 recovery plan. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 10-16

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.