Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (119 KB bytes)

Title: Impact of weed control and fertilization on growth of four species of pine in the Virginia Piedmont

Author: Amishev, Dzhamal Y.; Fox, Thomas R.;

Date: 2006

Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 121-123

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

   Note: This article is part of a larger document. View the larger document

Description: During 1999, a mixed stand of Virginia pine and hardwoods in the Piedmont of Virginia was clearcut and site prepared by burning. Three replications, containing strips of loblolly pine, shortleaf pine, Virginia pine, and Eastern white pine, were planted at a 3 m x 1.5 m spacing during February to June, 2000. The strips were subsequently split to accommodate four different silvicultural treatments: (1) check - no treatment; (2) weed control; (3) fertilization; and (4) weed control plus fertilization. Herbicides were applied in 2000 (broadcast Oust®), 2001 (directed spray of Garlon® plus Roundup®), and 2003 (directed spray of Roundup®) to control both herbaceous and woody competition. Fertilizers containing N, P, and K were applied in 2001, N only in 2002. Crop tree survival was highest for loblolly pine, followed by Virginia pine, shortleaf pine and, lastly, Eastern white pine. There was a significant species x silvicultural treatment interaction at this site. Total height after 4 years followed the pattern loblolly pine>Virginia pine=shortleaf pine>white pine. In loblolly pine, weed control and fertilization increased growth compared to the check. In white pine, there was no significant difference between weed control and weed control plus fertilization compared to the check. However, hite pines in the fertilized only plots were shortest due to increased hardwood competition that overtopped the pines.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Amishev, Dzhamal Y.; Fox, Thomas R. 2006. Impact of weed control and fertilization on growth of four species of pine in the Virginia Piedmont. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 121-123

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.