Title: Soil erosion from harvested sites versus streamside management zone sediment deposition in the Piedmont of Virginia
Author: Lakel, William A. III; Aust, W. Michael; Dolloff, C. Andrew; Easterbrook, Amy W.;
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 400-401
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Forestry best management practices were primarily developed to address two major issues related to soil erosion: water quality and site productivity. Sixteen watersheds managed as loblolly pine plantations in the piedmont region were monitored for soil erosion and water quality prior to treatment. Subsequently, all watersheds were harvested with clearcutting, ground-based skidding, prescribed burning, and installation of fire lines. Four blocks were established on the basis of geology, soils, topography, vegetation, and management. Within each block, 5 SMZ treatments (25-feet-wide, 50-feet-wide with and without partial harvest, and 100-feet-wide with and without partial harvest) were installed. On-site erosion was estimated for the watershed and within each major disturbance category (harvest, skid trails, fire lines) and contrasted with the quantity of sediment trapped by the various SMZ treatments.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Lakel, William A., III; Aust, W. Michael; Dolloff, C. Andrew; Easterbrook, Amy W. 2006. Soil erosion from harvested sites versus streamside management zone sediment deposition in the Piedmont of Virginia. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 400-401
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility