You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Performance of mixed pine-hardwood stands 16 years after fell-and-burn treatments
Author: Blizzard, Elizabeth M.; van Lear, David H.; Wang, G. Geoff; Waldrop, Thomas A.;
Source: Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 499-501
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Four variations of the fell-and-burn technique were compared for height and volume production on dry Piedmont sites. A two-factorial randomized complete block design of winter versus spring felling, with and without a summer burn, was implemented, followed by planting of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) at 15 x 15 foot spacing. After 16 growing seasons, the winter fell with summer burn treatment resulted in greater planted pine volume (1,087.1 ± 72.8 cubic feet per acre) than either unburned treatment (652.4 ± 89.2 cubic feet per acre). The winter fell with no burn treatment resulted in greater oak volume (373.5 ± 71.3 cubic feet per acre) than did either burn treatment (108.7 ± 58.3 cubic feet per acre). Modifications of the fell-and-burn treatment can be used to alter the dominance of pine or hardwood components in developing mixed pine-hardwood stands. Stands should be monitored for further effects of canopy closure, self-thinning, and growth of oaks into micro-canopy gaps.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to email@example.com to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Blizzard, Elizabeth M.; van Lear, David H.; Wang, G. Geoff; Waldrop, Thomas A. 2006. Performance of mixed pine-hardwood stands 16 years after fell-and-burn treatments. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-92. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp. 499-501
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility