Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (520 KB bytes)

Title: Testing a ground-based canopy model using the wind river canopy crane

Author: Van Pelt, Robert; North, Malcolm P.;

Date: 1999

Source: Selbyana, Vol. 20(2): 357-362

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: A ground-based canopy model that estimates the volume of occupied space in forest canopies was tested using the Wind River Canopy Crane. A total of 126 trees in a 0.25 ha area were measured from the ground and directly from a gondola suspended from the crane. The trees were located in a low elevation, old-growth forest in the southern Washington Cascades. The ground-based model was based on six measurements and assumptions about the individual crown shape (e.g., conic, parabolic). the crane-based measurements required up to 377 measurements per tree. The two models were then compared, both by species and by crown position, to see where major discrepancies occurred. At the stand scale, ground-based and crane-based models of canopy structure were similar. At the scale of individual trees, however, ground-based estimates of crown volume differed significantly from the more detailed models of crown shape afforded by direct canopy access with the crane. Douglas-fir crowns were overestimated by 10.6% Pacific yews were overestimated by 0.8% and western hemlocks were underestimated by 1.9%. While errors for yew and hemlock were smaller than for Douglas-fir. their standard deviations are much higher: 0.09 for Douglas-fir and 0.13 and 0.12 for Pacific yew and western hemlock, respectively. Most of the error resulted from model estimates of the lower crown, as epicormic branching and uneven shading caused highly irregular lower crowns in Douglas-fir. Over 85% of the differences between the two models among all the Douglas-fir trees were in the lower halves of the crowns. Similarly, 74% of the hemlock error and 58% of the Pacific yew error resulted from differences in their lower crowns. At the stand-level. the ground-based model of crown volume and the vertical distribution of foliage provided estimates consistent with more the detailed measurements made using the canopy crane.

Keywords: canopy model, ground-based measurements, crane-based measurements, canopy model comparisons, old-growth canopy, Douglas-fir canopy, Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii, western hemlock, Tsuga heterophylla

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Van Pelt, Robert; North, Malcolm P. 1999. Testing a ground-based canopy model using the wind river canopy crane. Selbyana, Vol. 20(2): 357-362

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.