Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (1.0 MB byte)

Title: Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades.

Author: Fiala, Anne C.S.; Garman, Steven L.; Gray, Andrew N.;

Date: 2006

Source: Forest Ecology and Management. 232: 188-197

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Estimates of forest canopy cover are widely used in forest research and management, yet methods used to quantify canopy cover and the estimates they provide vary greatly. Four commonly used ground-based techniques for estimating overstory cover - line-intercept, spherical densiometer, moosehorn, and hemispherical photography - and cover estimates generated from crown radii parameters of the western Cascades variant of the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) were compared in five Douglas-fir/western hemlock structure types in western Oregon. Differences in cover estimates among the ground-based methods were not related to stand-structure type (p = 0.33). As expected, estimates of cover increased and stand-level variability decreased with increasing angle of view among techniques. However, the moosehorn provided the most conservative estimates of vertical-projection overstory cover. Regression equations are provided to permit conversion among canopy cover estimates made with the four ground-based techniques. These equations also provide a means for integrating cover data from studies that use different techniques, thus aiding in the ability to conduct synthetic research. Ground-based measures are recommended for specific objectives. Because the FVS-estimated cover levels were consistently lower and more variable than most of the ground-based estimates (by up to 44.17% on average), ground-based measures of canopy cover may be preferable when accuracy is an important objective.

Keywords: Oregon Cascades, canopy cover, line intercept, densiometer, moosehorn, hemispherical photography, FVS

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pnw_pnwpubs@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Fiala, Anne C.S.; Garman, Steven L.; Gray, Andrew N. 2006. Comparison of five canopy cover estimation techniques in the western Oregon Cascades. Forest Ecology and Management. 232: 188-197

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.