Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (142 KB bytes)

Title: Sampling small mammals in southeastern forests: the importance of trapping in trees

Author: Loeb, Susan C.; Chapman, Gregg L.; Ridley, Theodore R.;

Date: 2001

Source: Proceedings of the annual conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 53: 415-424.

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Because estimates of small mammal species richness and diversity are strongly influenced by sampling methodology, 2 or more trap types are often used in studies of small mammal communities. However, in most cases, all traps are placed at ground level. In contrast, we used Sherman live traps placed at 1.5 m in trees in addition to Sherman live traps and Mosby box traps placed on the ground to sample small mammals in pine stands in the Upper Coastal Plain of South Carolina. To determine the importance of placing traps in trees, we compared estimates of small mammal (primarily rodent) species richness and diversity based on data from all traps (ground and tree) with estimates based on data from ground traps only. Estimates of species richness based on data from ground traps only did not differ from estimates based on data from all traps. However, 4 other diversity indices (Simpson Index, Shannon-Wiener Index, Shannon Evenness Index, and Brillouin Index) based on data from both tree and ground traps were significantly greater than indices based on data from ground traps only. The increase in the diversity estimates when data from all traps were used was primarily due to the large number of southern flying squirrels (Glaucomys volans) captured in tree traps. When data from ground traps only were considered, the community was highly dominated by cotton mice (Peromyscus gossypinus), but, when data from all traps were considered, cotton mice and southern flying squirrels were co-dominant (567 and 580 individuals, respectively). Our data suggest that studies of forest small mammal communities which do not include tree traps are biased because one of the most common and potentially important species, the southern flying squirrel, is highly underrepresented. We recommend that future studies of forest mammal communities, particularly those designed to test the effects of forest management practices on small mammal communities, include arboreal traps.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Loeb, Susan C.; Chapman, Gregg L.; Ridley, Theodore R. 2001. Sampling small mammals in southeastern forests: the importance of trapping in trees. Proceedings of the annual conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. 53: 415-424.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.