Title: Enhancing the value of the breeding bird survey: reply to Sauer et al. (2005)
Author: Francis, Charles M.; Bart, Jonathan; Dunn, Erica H.; Burnham, Kenneth P.; Ralph, C. John;
Source: Journal of Wildlife Management 69(4):1327-1332
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Bart et al (2004a) proposed several approaches for enhancing the considerable value of the Breeding Bird Survey (BBS). Sauer et al. (2005) critiqued some of these approaches, and emphasized alternative goals for the survey. We agree with many of the suggestions of Sauer et al. (2005); notably that multispecies, large-scale surveys such as the BBS are most valuable for bird conservation if they achieve multiple objectives. Nevertheless, we strongly assert that estimation of long-term trends is of fundamental importance for identifying important conservation issues and determining which species represent priorities for conservation efforts, as has been repeatedly demonstrated in the past. We are confident that our recommendations for enhancing the ability of the BBS to detect trends—reducing bias, explicitly recognizing that all bias cannot be eliminated, and increasing sample size in poorly covered areas—can only enhance, and not detract from, the value of the BBS for other purposes.
Keywords: bias, bird surveys, monitoring, North American Breeding Bird Survey, population trends, trend estimation.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
XML: View XML
Francis, Charles M.; Bart, Jonathan; Dunn, Erica H.; Burnham, Kenneth P.; Ralph, C. John 2005. Enhancing the value of the breeding bird survey: reply to Sauer et al. (2005). Journal of Wildlife Management 69(4):1327-1332
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility