You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber?
Author: Rummber, Robert; Klepac, John.;
Source: Small Diameter Timber: Resource Management, Manufacturing, and Markets, Spokane, Washington.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: Two harvesting systems, one manual post-and-rail and one small-scale cut-to-length harvester, were compared in a lodgepole pine thinning. Elemental time study data were collected, along with estimates of residual stand damage. The harvester was about as productive as a manual crew of five. For material 5" and larger, the cost for felling, processing and piling small material with the harvester was less than the manual operation. However, the mechanized system resulted in considerably more residual stand damage.
Keywords: costs, cut-to-length, harvester, lodgepole pine
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Rummber, Robert; Klepac, John. 2002. Mechanized or hand operations: which is less expensive for small timber?. Small Diameter Timber: Resource Management, Manufacturing, and Markets, Spokane, Washington.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility