Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (2.3 MB)

Title: Non-native and native seeding

Author: Beyers, J. L.;

Date: 2009

Source: In: Cerdá, A.; Robichaud, P. R., eds. Fire effects on soils and restoration strategies. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. pp 321-336

Publication Series: Book

Description:

Post-fire seeding is used to stabilize burned slopes by increasing plant cover, prevent invasion of burned areas by noxious weeds, replace weedy annual grasses on burned rangelands, and reestablish desirable vegetation including tree species. Fast-growing pasture grasses and forbs have been most widely applied for post-fire stabilization and rehabilitation, but use of native species is increasing. Successful ground cover enhancement with seeded species depends on protection of the seed from predators and desiccation, the amount and timing of growing-season rainfall, and resting the area from grazing . until seeded species and natural regeneration are well-established. As these conditions are often not met, grass seeding has a mixed record of success for erosion reduction and rangeland rehabilitation. In cases where post-fire erosion would threaten life or property, a more effective hillslope stabilization method should probably be used. Seeded grasses can displace native herbaceous plants in post-fire succession, and high grass cover can limit recruitment of tree and shrub seedlings on burned sites. Land managers must weigh the potential erosion control and noxious weed reduction benefits against the economic cost -of seeding, the ecological cost of native plant suppression, and the possible economic cost to replant timber species.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Beyers, J. L. 2009. Non-native and native seeding. In: Cerdá, A.; Robichaud, P. R., eds. Fire effects on soils and restoration strategies. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers. pp 321-336

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.