Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service

Research & Development Treesearch

Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help - We Participate  Government Made Easy

Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (895 KB)

Title: Soil analysis based on sa,ples withdrawn from different volumes: correlation versus calibration

Author: Weilopolski, Lucian; Johnsen, Kurt; Zhang, Yuen.;

Date: 2010

Source: SSAJ, Vol. 74(3): 812-820

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Soil, particularly in forests, is replete with spatial variation with respect to soil C. Th e present standard chemical method for soil analysis by dry combustion (DC) is destructive, and comprehensive sampling is labor intensive and time consuming. Th ese, among other factors, are contributing to the development of new methods for soil analysis. Th ese include a near- and mid-infrared (NIR and MIR) spectroscopy, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), and inelastic neutron scattering (INS). Th ese technologies overcome many of the state-ofthe- art DC method’s shortcomings and off er advances that it cannot. While NIR and MIR measure C bonds, the other two new methods, like DC, are more specifi c in measuring C and other elements based on chemical, atomic, and nuclear reactions. In addition to their fundamentally diff erent physical principles, these approaches vastly diff er in the volumes they typically sample: LIBS, 10−9 m3; DC, 10−7 m3; NIR and MIR, 10−6 m3; and INS, about 0.3 m3. Th us, extra care is needed when comparing the fi ndings from any two of these methods. Also, the high heterogeneity of the soil matrix, the nonuniformity of C distribution, and the presence of coarse fragments, particularly in forested ecosystems, further compound the diffi culties in making direct comparisons. We investigated the implications of these differences when correlating any two of these methods and reviewed the processes of comparing a volumetric measurement against a point measurement. We also conducted a detailed comparison of the INS method with the standard DC test. We found that the total (soil organic matter and roots) measured by the INS correlated better than its components with the DC analyses( r2 = 0.97, P = 10−7). Th e samples for DC analysis were taken from excavations of 40- by 40- by 40-cm plots, in 5- and 10-cm layers.

Keywords: DC, dry combustion, INS, inelastic neutron scattering, LIBS, laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)



Weilopolski, Lucian; Johnsen, Kurt; Zhang, Yuen. 2010. Soil analysis based on sa,ples withdrawn from different volumes: correlation versus calibration. SSAJ, Vol. 74(3): 812-820


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.