Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (621 KB)

Title: Restoring native plants to crested wheatgrass stands

Author: Fansler, Valerie A.; Mangold, Jane M.;

Date: 2010

Source: Restoration Ecology. doi 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00678.x

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Crested wheatgrass (Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn.) is a nonindigenous grass introduced to North America for improving degraded rangelands. It is often criticized for forming nearly monotypic stands. Our objective was to determine the feasibility of restoring native plant species to crested wheatgrass-dominated rangeland. We investigated methods for suppressing crested wheatgrass followed by revegetation with a mix of native species. We tested five suppression treatments: undisturbed, low rate of glyphosate (0.25x recommended rate), high rate of glyphosate (recommended rate), 1-pass mechanical (disked once), and 2-pass mechanical (disked twice). Procedures were repeated in two trials in separate years. We sampled density and canopy cover of crested wheatgrass and density of seeded species for three (trial 1) and two (trial 2) years. Mechanical treatments increased crested wheatgrass density by 30-50%, whereas most other treatments were similar to the undisturbed (6.8 plants/m2). Crested wheatgrass cover decreased in mechanical and full herbicide treatments in trial 1 and was variable across treatments in trial 2. Seeded species density in all treatments (29 plants/m2) was greater than in the undisturbed treatment (18 plants/m2) 1 year after seeding in trial 1 and was similar across treatments (26 plants/m2) in trial 2. By the end of the study, though, all treatments resulted in similar seeded species density (<5 plants/m2). Results suggest suppression treatments were not effective and therefore did not improve restoration of native species in crested wheatgrass stands. Native species establishment may require subsequent management to favor persistence of native species and retard crested wheatgrass.

Keywords: Agropyron cristatum, disturbance, rangeland restoration, revegetation, succession

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Fansler, Valerie A.; Mangold, Jane M. 2010. Restoring native plants to crested wheatgrass stands. Restoration Ecology. doi 10.1111/j.1526-100X.2010.00678.x

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.