You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Trees are good, but…
Author: McPherson, E.G.; Ferrini, F.;
Source: Arborist News 19(5): 58-60
Publication Series: Other
Description: We know that “trees are good,” and most people believe this to be true. But if this is so, why are so many trees neglected, and so many tree wells empty? An individual’s attitude toward trees may result from their firsthand encounters with specific trees. Understanding how attitudes about trees are shaped, particularly aversion to trees, is critical to the business of sustaining healthy urban forests. Social scientists can play a large role by helping us understand the complex origins and impacts of tree antipathy. For example, attitudes about trees can be influenced by socio-cultural factors (e.g., trees keep witches away), hereditary traits (e.g., allergies), and chance experiences (e.g., trip and fall). Physical scientists can play a role by further clarifying relations between the trees we plant, their management, and human health and well-being. Truthful and accurate information about trees is important to trustworthy communication. Science and research can provide credible information you can use to knowledgably plan and manage trees. We provide a few examples in this article.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
XML: View XML
McPherson, E.G.; Ferrini, F. 2010. Trees are good, but… Arborist News 19(5): 58-60
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility