Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (4.2 MB)

Title: Comparison of two thinning systems. Part 1. Stand and site impacts

Author: Lanford, Bobby L.; Stokes, Bryce J.;

Date: 1995

Source: Forest Prod. J. 45(5): 74-79

Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)

Description: During the winter of 1991, a side-by-side comparison was made between two popular thinning systems:a feller-buncher, grapple skidder, loader/slasher system and a harvester, forwarder system. A first commercial thinning was conducted in an 18-year-old loblolly pine stand Test areas were cruised prior to thinning and remeasured after operations were completed The target basal area per acre was successfully met by the forwarder system but not by the skidder system. Individual tree damage was recorded during plot remeasurement. The skidder system scanned 25 trees per acre versus 10 trees per acre with the forwarder system. Ground disturbance was recorded by two samples. One focused on skidder and forwarder trails where the area in various levels of disturbance was measured along with soil bulk density. The other sample was a systematic survey covering the entire study area and gave an overall sample of ground disturbance levels. The skidder system had more disturbed area and compacted the soil more than the forwarder system.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Lanford, Bobby L.; Stokes, Bryce J. 1995. Comparison of two thinning systems. Part 1. Stand and site impacts. Forest Prod. J. 45(5): 74-79.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.