You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States
Author: Armatas, Christopher A.; Venn, Tyron J.; Watson, Alan E.;
Source: Ecological Economics. 107: 447-456.
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Description: The underlying validity of stated preference non-market valuation methods relies on the analyst's ability to identify, select, define, and articulate the goods being valued in a way that is relevant and understandable to the respondent, which requires detailed understanding of the respondents' experiences and points of view. Poor articulation of the good being valued will result in biased to useless information for decision-makers. It should therefore be of concern to economists and policymakers that the question of how best to perform pre-design qualitative work with local stakeholders is a neglected area of inquiry. This paper assesses Q-methodology as an objective, transparent, easily replicable, and statistically-rigorous approach to qualitative research to support the selection and definition of attributes for non-market valuation.
Keywords: stated preference methods, ecosystem services, environmental goods, environmental valuation, factor analysis, survey methods, qualitative methods
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
XML: View XML
Armatas, Christopher A.; Venn, Tyron J.; Watson, Alan E. 2014. Applying Q-methodology to select and define attributes for non-market valuation: A case study from Northwest Wyoming, United States. Ecological Economics. 107: 447-456.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility