Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (797 KB)

Title: E1-09 Termite Choice Testing: What is it good for?

Author: Green, Frederick III; Lebow, Patti; Kartal, S. Nami;

Date: 2014

Source: Proceedings, 108th Annual Meeting of the American Wood Protection Association, April 29 – May 2, 2012. Nashville, TN. 108: 2014; pp. 137-143.

Publication Series: Full Proceedings

Description: The prime objective of this investigation was to compare mass loss from termite attack on NHA treated and untreated pine blocks simultaneously in a two-block choice test using Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar). Southern pine blocks were vacuum treated with aqueous solutions of NHA ranging from 250-10,000 ppm and exposed to one gram of R. flavipes workers in the dual block choice test which included one treated and one untreated block per the modified AWPA laboratory test (E1-09). At the end of four weeks, all test blocks were removed, weighed and the mass losses statistically modeled using SAS version 9.2. Mass loss was consistently greater in the untreated pair-blocks and ranged from 18-35%. Weight loss in the NHA-treated blocks was highest at low concentrations (18%) and decreased to < 1% at 10,000 ppm. Termite mortality at the end of four weeks was slight or negligible. We conclude that exposure to untreated pine during exposure to the NHA blocks delayed the 100% mortality previously observed in similar no-choice test using similar NHA concentrations of NHA, either by reducing NHA intake below toxic levels or altering gut pH. Modest accelerated feeding (stimulation) on the control blocks was observed only in the 2,600 ppm group. Overall, NHA treatment in pine behaves like a typical repellent wood preservative: as the concentration of preservative increases, feeding and mass loss decreases, however addition of an untreated pine block abrogates the high toxicity of NHA to R. flavipes (100%).

Keywords: NHA, Reticulitermes flavipes (Kollar), dual choice test, feeding stimulant

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Green, Frederick III; Lebow, Patti; Kartal, S. Nami 2014. E1-09 Termite Choice Testing: What is it good for?. Proceedings, 108th Annual Meeting of the American Wood Protection Association, April 29 – May 2, 2012. Nashville, TN. 108: 2014; pp. 137-143.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.