You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: A note on nonlinearity bias and dichotomous choice CVM: implications for aggregate benefits estimation
Author: Souter, R.A.; Bowker, J. Michael;
Source: Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. April: 54-59.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: It is a generally known statistical fact that the mean of a nonlinear function of a set of random variables is not equivalent to the function evaluated at the means of the variables. However, in dichotomous choice contingent valuation studies, a common practice is to calculate an overall mean (or median) by integrating over offer space (numerically or analytically) an estimated logit or probit function in which sample mean values for the concomitant variables are used. The authors demonstrate this procedure to be incorrect and statistically test the procedure against the correct method for nonlinear models. Using data resulting in a well-behaved logit model, the authors reject the hypothesis of congruence between the two means. Such a finding should be considered in future single response dichotomous choice CVM studies, particularly when aggregation is of interest.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Souter, R.A.; Bowker, J. Michael 1996. A note on nonlinearity bias and dichotomous choice CVM: implications for aggregate benefits estimation. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review. April: 54-59.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility