You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Searching for consensus in molt terminology 11 years after Howell et al.'s "first basic problem"
Author: Wolfe, Jared D.; Johnson, Erik I.; Terrill, Ryan S.;
Source: The Auk. 131(3): 371-377
Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)
Description: Howell et al. (2003) published an innovative augmentation to terminology proposed by Humphrey and Parkes (1959) that classified bird molt on the basis of perceived evolutionary relationships. Despite apparent universal applicability, Howell et al.’s (2003) proposed terminological changes were met with criticism that cited a failure to verify the evolutionary relationships of molt and an inability to recognize homologous molts even within closely related taxa. Eleven years after Howell et al. (2003), we revisit arguments against a terminological system of molt based on evolutionary relationships, suggest an analytical framework to satisfactorily respond to critics, clarify terminology, and consider how to study molt variation within an evolutionary framework.
Keywords: first basic problem, Howell et al. (2003), molt cycle, molt strategies, molt terminology, phylogenetic analysis
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
XML: View XML
Wolfe, Jared D.; Johnson, Erik I.; Terrill, Ryan S. 2014. Searching for consensus in molt terminology 11 years after Howell et al.'s "first basic problem." The Auk. 131(3): 371-377.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility