You are here: Home
/ Publication Information
Title: Comparison of Field Methods and Models to Estimate Mean Crown Diameter
Author: Bechtold, William A.; Mielke, Manfred E.; Zarnoch, Stanley J.;
Source: Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 177-182 December 2002.
Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication
Description: The direct measurement of crown diameters with logger's tapes adds significantly to the cost of extensive forest inventories. We undertook a study of 100 trees to compare this measurement method to four alternatives-two field instruments, ocular estimates, and regression models. Using the taping method as the standard of comparison, accuracy of the tested alternatives was adequate for softwood species, but short of the specified measurement quality objectivefor estimating the mean crown diameter of hardwoods. Due to savings infield costs, ocular estimation and regression models were the best alternatives to direct measurement with logger's tapes.
- We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
- This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
- You may send email to firstname.lastname@example.org to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly
which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)
XML: View XML
Bechtold, William A.; Mielke, Manfred E.; Zarnoch, Stanley J. 2002. Comparison of Field Methods and Models to Estimate Mean Crown Diameter. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry, Vol. 19, No. 4, p. 177-182 December 2002.
Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility