Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (781.0 KB bytes)

Title: Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. II. Forage quality and its species-level plasticity

Author: Pang, Kejia; Van Sambeek, J.W.; Navarrete-Tindall, Nadia E.; Lin, Chung-Ho; Jose, Shibu; Garrett, H. E.;

Date: 2017

Source: Agroforestry Systems.

Publication Series: Scientific Journal (JRNL)

Description: From a series of shade tolerance screening trials conducted in an outdoor Shade Tolerance Screening Laboratory, 22 forages (16 grasses and 6 legumes) were selected for quality evaluation. The forages were grown under non-shade (100% of full sun, the control), moderate shade (45%), and dense shade (20%) with adequate water and nutrients and free of competition from other plants. All 22 forages had equal or higher percent crude protein (%CP) and CP yield (g pot-1) under moderate shade than in the control. Under dense shade, 22 and 18 forages had equal or higher %CP and CP yield than in the control, respectively. Under moderate and dense shade, 14 and 15 forages, respectively, maintained relative feed value (RFV) equal to that in the control. Legumes had higher %CP and RFV than grasses with no differences for CP yield. Relative distance plasticity index (RDPI), an indicator of a species' adaptability to different environments, suggested grasses maintained RFV better than legumes under shade, while legumes were more resilient under shade in maintaining %CP than grasses. Our results suggest most grass and legume forages will maintain or have improved quality when grown in agroforestry practices with light to moderate shade compared to forages grown in open pastures.

Keywords: Shade tolerance, Crude protein, Relative feed value, Relative distance plasticity index

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • This publication may be available in hard copy. Check the Northern Research Station web site to request a printed copy of this publication.
  • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact Sharon Hobrla, shobrla@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unusable.

XML: View XML

Citation:


Pang, Kejia; Van Sambeek, J.W.; Navarrete-Tindall, Nadia E.; Lin, Chung-Ho; Jose, Shibu; Garrett, H.E. 2017. Responses of legumes and grasses to non-, moderate, and dense shade in Missouri, USA. II. Forage quality and its species-level plasticity. Agroforestry Systems. 14 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0068-7

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.