Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (173 KB)

Title: Classifying features in CT imagery: accuracy for some single- and multiple-species classifiers

Author: Schmoldt, Daniel L.; He, Jing; Abbott, A. Lynn;

Date: 1998

Source: Proceedings, 3rd International Seminar/Workshop on Scanning Technology and Image Processing on Wood

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: Our current approach to automatically label features in CT images of hardwood logs classifies each pixel of an image individually. These feature classifiers use a back-propagation artificial neural network (ANN) and feature vectors that include a small, local neighborhood of pixels and the distance of the target pixel to the center of the log. Initially, this type of ANN was able to classify clear wood, bark, decay, knots, and voids in CT images of two species of oak (Quercus rubra, L., Quercus nigra, L.) with 95% pixel-wise accuracy. Recently we have investigated other ANN classifiers, comparing 2-D versus 3-D neighborhoods and species-dependent (single species) versus species-independent (multiple species) classifiers using oak, yellow poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera, L.), and black cherry (Prunus serotina, L.) CT images. When considered individually, the resulting speciesdependent classifiers yield similar levels of accuracy (96-98%); however, all classifiers achieve greater than 91% accuracy. 3-D neighborhoods work better for multiple-species classifiers and 2-D is better for single-species. Multiple-species classifiers, whose training included both cherry and yellow poplar examples, exhibit the lowest accuracy. Nevertheless, when this combination of species is avoided, there is no statistical difference in accuracy between single- and multiple-species classifiers, suggesting that a multiple-species classifier can be applied broadly with high accuracy. Because all reported accuracy values are prior to postprocessing operations (which visually improve classification accuracy), we are confident that even the least accurate classifiers would be adequate for industrial implementation.

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to pubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Schmoldt, Daniel L.; He, Jing; Abbott, A. Lynn 1998. Classifying features in CT imagery: accuracy for some single- and multiple-species classifiers. Proceedings, 3rd International Seminar/Workshop on Scanning Technology and Image Processing on Wood

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.