Skip to page content
USDA Forest Service
  
Treesearch

Research & Development Treesearch

 
Treesearch Home
About Treesearch
Contact Us
Research & Development
Forest Products Lab
International Institute of Tropical Forestry
Northern
Pacific Northwest
Pacific Southwest
Rocky Mountain
Southern Research Station
Help
 

Science.gov - We Participate


USA.gov  Government Made Easy


Global Forest Information Service

US Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C.
20090-6090

(202) 205-8333

You are here: Home / Search / Publication Information
Bookmark and Share

Publication Information

View PDF (760 KB bytes)

Title: Comparative habitat use of sympatric Mexican spotted and great horned owls

Author: Ganey, Joseph L.; Block, William M.; Jenness, Jeffrey S.; Wilson, Randolph A.;

Date: 1997

Source: Journal of Wildlife Research. 2(2): 115-123.

Publication Series: Miscellaneous Publication

Description: To provide information on comparative habitat use, we studied radiotagged Mexican spotted owls (Strix occidentalis lucida: n = 13) and great horned owls (Bubo virginianus: n = 4) in northern Arizona. Home-range size (95% adaptive kernel estimate) did not differ significantly between species during either the breeding or nonbreeding season. Home ranges overlapped considerably between species, but overlap in use of individual stands was limited. Relative area of 4 canopy-cover classes (<20, 20-39, 40-59, and [greater than/equal to] 60% canopy cover) and 3 cover types (ponderosa pine forest, pine-oak forest. and meadow) did not differ between ranges of spotted and great horned owls in either season. Use of canopy-cover classes differed between species in both seasons, however, and use of cover types differed during the breeding season. In general, great horned owls used meadows and open stands (canopy cover <40%) more than spotted owls, who roosted and foraged primarily in forests with [greater than/equal to] 40% canopy cover. Structural characteristics of forest stands within the home range also differed between species, as did characteristics of stands used for foraging and roosting. Differences in structural characteristics were consistent with observed differences in use of canopy-cover classes and cover types: stands used by great horned owls had lower log volume, less shrub and canopy cover, and greater herbaceous cover than stands used by spotted owls. The observed patterns of habitat use are consistent with morphological features suggesting that great horned owls are adapted to hunt in more open habitats than spotted owls. Our results suggest that silvicultural treatments that reduce canopy cover below 40% or create large openings within the forest will likely favor great horned owls, whereas maintenance of closed-canopy stands (canopy cover [greater than/equal to] 60%) should favor spotted owls. Such stands were rare in our study area, arguing for their conservation where they occur.

Keywords: Arizona, Bubo virginianus, great horned owl, habitat use, home range, Mexican spotted owl, pine-oak forest, radiotelemetry, Strix occidentalis lucida

Publication Notes:

  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • You may send email to rmrspubrequest@fs.fed.us to request a hard copy of this publication. (Please specify exactly which publication you are requesting and your mailing address.)

XML: View XML

Citation:


Ganey, Joseph L.; Block, William M.; Jenness, Jeffrey S.; Wilson, Randolph A. 1997. Comparative habitat use of sympatric Mexican spotted and great horned owls. Journal of Wildlife Research. 2(2): 115-123.

 


 [ Get Acrobat ]  Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.